November 2006 Archives

Long Live The Polar Bear

Recently there has been a big bruhaha in the IA/UX world over Joshua Porter’s post declaring that information architecture is dead. If you haven't read it yet, it's a great way to get the blood pumping first thing in the morning.

I read the post and just sighed and shook my head. Folks just don't get it. IA doesn't have to be put in a box. It's more than just "make my web go better" (as Peterme likes to say) - physical IA, mobile, etc.

But the "make the web go better" is still valid. There are a lot of interesting, important web-based problems that are still out there. I wonder how much of our 30-second sound bite culture is behind this obsession with "solving" something and immediately moving on?

Both the Good Peter and the Bad Peter have had very thoughtful and articulate responses. I highly recommend you check them out.

The Last Mile

--- Originally published on the Adaptive Path Blog ---

I spent this past Holiday week in northern Colorado visiting family and friends. We had great fun and lots of wonderful food, as I hope many did. While I was there, talk turned to the internet and the web, as it is aft to do with my boyfriend and me, and I was struck at the number of people who were on dial-up or had no internet access at all.

Dial-up? I haven't used a modem since, well; I can't remember how long it's been. All the designing and consulting that I do as part of my job assumes a broadband connection. I can't remember the last time a client was concerned about how a site would perform over a 56k modem. With all the Flash, big images and Ajax on sites these days, how slow and painful it must it be to surf the web.

What kind of effect is this going to have in the long term? How many folks will go without because the cost of a satellite connection is prohibitory expensive? How do usage habits change when the only access comes via work or requires a drive to a local library? What kind of cultural divide is growing between those that live and breath the web without even thinking about it and those who can't?

These used to be issues that were often discussed, but I hardly hear about them anymore. I always assumed it was because they were solved, not that they're just being ignored.

IA: More Than Just Rearranging Marketing Sites

--- Originally published on the Adaptive Path Blog ---

Lately I've gotten the feeling that there are those who feel that information architecture and interaction design are at odds with each other. I don't mean to get into another debate on defining the damn thing or anything like that. But for me, information architecture and interaction design have always been very closely intertwined. Where does one stop and the other begin? It's often hard to tell and in the end, does it really matter?

Adaptive Path recently did a project focusing on vertical search, and specifically integrating multiple search engines into a single experience. I consider the work I did on that project to be mostly information architecture because it was so focused on search -- a key component in the "ways to find things" toolbox.

But it also required a lot of interaction design. How do you take three very different interfaces and provide one overall experience to them all? Good question. There was much wireframing and musing over the controls and filters we presented to people to figure that out.

Interaction design is certainly the darling of the Internet and user experience community right now. I think the excitement of Ajax and what it brings to the web experience is a driving factor behind this. Sprinkling Ajaxy-goodness on a page is cool. Spending the day thinking about how can we make things move and glow and change effortlessly? That's the most fun part of interaction design (at least for me).

But that doesn't mean that information architecture has to take a backseat, that due to its librarian roots IA must be quietly sitting in a corner pushing up its glasses and wearing a cardigan sweater (no offence to the librarians out there. Remember, I am a librarian after all). But IA is more than just rearranging brochures and product descriptions on a marketing site. There are a lot of really cool and interesting IA-centric problems out there still waiting to be solved.

Jesse asked me today what it was that was exciting about IA. There's lots. Take that vertical search project for one; search is way cool and very interesting and nowhere near solved. With search comes good things like metadata, tagging, controlled vocabularies and taxonomies. Okay, so a taxonomy doesn't sound or look as cool and sexy as Ajax does. But for the folks so inclined towards it, there are really slick things that can be done with a solid information governance policy. Which gets us to Enterprise Information Architecture; that umbrella concept that runs through a whole organization.

But we are still left with the underlying feeling that infrastructure is not hot. Think back to Jesse's Elements of User Experience [ http://www.jjg.net/elements/pdf/elements.pdf ], or Stewart Brand's How Buildings Learn where he talks about the rates of component change in buildings [ http://sb.longnow.org/Bldgs%20slides.html ]. Information architecture fits squarely in the infrastructure layer. It's the support that everything else hangs on. If you can't find what you are looking for, it doesn't matter how well designed the item is.

We still need IA to make a good user experience. All the Ajax in the world couldn't make a great site if there wasn't a solid structure and organization holding it together. I hope we don't lose sight of that.

About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries from November 2006 listed from newest to oldest.

October 2006 is the previous archive.

December 2006 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Archives

Recent Comments

  • Laura Zucchetti: Speaking as someone who started out as a jack of read more
  • Kate: Hey Chiara: This is a wonderful post. I am so read more
  • Lisa Paul: Wow. This is great. I always try to shop proactively read more
  • Elisa Camahort Page: Thanks Chiara!! Hope we will see you in Chicago this read more
  • Chiara: Hi Conner- That's great that you are happy with the read more
  • Conner Versione: I used these guys for my website www.cellularbling.com. They did read more
  • Conner Versione: Conner, I used these guys to add a video to read more
  • Mamacita: Wow, I've been quoted! Thank you so much for those read more
  • scotter: Yes, I guess that anger hangover is right. read more
  • anger hangover: i've been blogging for a few years and i don't read more
Powered by Movable Type 5.04